Photo of Anand Sithian

Anand Sithian

Subscribe to Anand Sithian's Posts

For high-stakes internal and government investigations and complex regulatory and compliance matters, companies and individuals look to Anand to provide strategic advice and counseling, particularly on issues relating to the Bank Secrecy Act and Anti-Money Laundering (“BSA/AML”), economic sanctions, and digital assets. Anand is resident in the firm’s New York office and a member of the firm’s International Trade, White Collar and Regulatory Enforcement, and Financial Services groups.

A former federal prosecutor, Anand leverages his government experience to guide clients through complex white-collar matters, including grand jury and regulatory investigations, enforcement proceedings, and internal investigations. Anand has deep experience in parallel criminal and civil investigations and proceedings, and often represents clients in defending against civil lawsuits related to government investigations.

Representing some of the world’s largest banks and technology companies, Anand has addressed a wide range of issues, including economic sanctions, BSA/AML; economic sanctions and national security; payments and cryptocurrency; securities laws; and cybersecurity enforcement. In the regulatory space, Anand prides himself on providing commercial and actionable advice, including in the developing areas of digital assets, FinTech, and payments.

Contact:Read more about Anand Sithian

Key Takeaways 

  • The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated six individuals and entities tied to Cartel del Noreste (CDN)—one of Mexico’s most violent drug trafficking organizations—including two CDN-affiliated casinos used for money laundering and drug operations near the U.S.-Mexico border. 
  • OFAC’s actions are the latest examples of a broader national security strategy to use sanctions, AML authorities, criminal prosecutions, and other tools to counter cartels on the U.S.-Mexico border. These efforts have targeted in particular non-traditional financial institutions such as casinos, public-facing professionals, and disinformation actors. 
  • The State Department designated CDN as a foreign terrorist organization (FTO) on February 20, 2026, and today’s designations were issued under both Executive Order 14059 (narcotics trafficking) and Executive Order 13224 (terrorism), underscoring the U.S. government’s treatment of major cartels as hybrid criminal-terrorist threats.
Continue Reading OFAC Sanctions Cartel-Linked Casinos and Financial Enablers on the Southern Border 

On Jan. 14, New York state Sen. Zellnor Myrie proposed legislation in the New York State Senate that would amend New York law to make it a criminal offense to operate a virtual currency business in the state without the proper license.

By introducing the possibility of criminal penalties, S.B. 8901 — the Cryptocurrency Regulation…

Overview

On March 12, 2026, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) took formal steps toward establishing additional regulations for prediction markets. The agency issued an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) soliciting public input on potential new rules, and separately, released staff guidance outlining its views on how existing rules apply to prediction market platforms currently in operation. These developments signal a significant shift in the regulatory landscape for an industry that has grown rapidly over the past year.

Continue Reading CFTC Takes Additional Steps Toward Prediction Market Regulation: What You Need to Know

What You Need to Know

Key Takeaway #1: FinCEN will no longer require covered financial institutions to identify and verify beneficial owners of legal entity customers each time the customer opens a new account at the institution, but rather only in certain circumstances.

Key Takeaway #2: FinCEN will instead require certain financial institutions to identify and verify the identities of such beneficial owners: (1) when a legal entity customer first opens an account with a covered financial institution; (2) when the covered financial institution has knowledge of facts that would reasonably call into question the reliability of beneficial ownership information previously obtained about the legal entity customer; and (3) as needed based on a covered financial institution’s risk-based procedures for conducting ongoing customer due diligence. For (3), covered financial institutions may rely on the customer’s certification that its beneficial ownership information has not changed, unless there is reason to question this.

Key Takeaway #3: The exceptive relief is the latest instance of recent efforts by the Department of the Treasury to modernize and eliminate unnecessary burdens associated with BSA rules; covered financial institutions are likely to welcome the relief.

Continue Reading FinCEN Grants Exceptive Relief to Streamline Beneficial Ownership Verification Requirements for Financial Institutions

On January 14, 2026, State Senator Zellnor Myrie proposed legislation in the New York State Senate that would amend New York law to make it a criminal offense to operate a virtual currency business in New York without the proper license. By introducing the possibility of criminal penalties, Senate Bill S. 8901, the Cryptocurrency Regulation Yields Protections, Trust, and Oversight Act (CRYPTO Act), would mark a significant regulatory shift in the state’s oversight of virtual currency businesses, given New York’s prominence in virtual currency regulation in the U.S.

Continue Reading Proposed NY Legislation May Mean Potential Criminal Charges for Unlicensed Crypto Firms

Crowell has been ranked a leading firm by Chambers FinTech in the USA Nationwide Crypto-Asset Disputes category. Crowell’s Anand Sithian has been named a notable practitioner in this area.

According to Chambers, Crowell’s FinTech practice has “strong corporate, financial services and white-collar capabilities to support clients across transactions and evolving regulatory frameworks.”

Chambers FinTech offers…

On November 13, 2025, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s (“Treasury’s”) Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) issued a finding (“Finding”) and related notice of proposed rulemaking (“Proposed Rule”) pursuant to Section 311 of the USA PATRIOT Act (“Section 311”), targeting ten Mexico-based gambling establishments (“Gambling Establishments”).  FinCEN found transactions involving the Gambling Establishments to constitute a “class of transactions” of “primary money-laundering concern” for purposes of Section 311.  In particular, FinCEN found that the Gambling Establishments ultimately were controlled by a criminal group that used the establishments to facilitate money laundering for the Sinaloa Cartel.…

Continue Reading Treasury Continues Focus on Cartels: Understanding FinCEN’s Latest Action Restricting Transactions with Certain Mexico-Based Gambling Establishments

Key Takeaways

Key takeaway #1 — The SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance (the Staff) announced that it will not consider “meme coins” – as described in the Staff’s statement – as “securities” under federal securities laws, and therefore not subject to SEC jurisdiction. 

Key takeaway #2 — The Staff views meme coin purchasers and holders as not protected by federal securities laws.

Key takeaway #3 — The Staff carefully noted that whether any specific meme coin is or is not a security under the federal securities laws depends on the specific facts relating to that meme coin and the circumstances of its offer and sale.

Key takeaway #4 —SEC enforcement involving meme coins is likely to be muted, but other state or federal agencies could use their authorities to bring enforcement against participants in meme coin fraud schemes, such as “pump and dumps” or “rug pulls.”

On February 27, 2025, the Staff issued a statement (the Staff Statement) clarifying the application of the federal securities laws to crypto assets, specifically “meme coins.” Meme coins are a category of cryptocurrency tokens typically driven by internet trends or popular culture (e.g., memes).  The Staff said that it does not view transactions in meme coins (as described in the Staff Statement) as involving the offer or sale of securities under federal securities laws.  However, the Staff Statement does not expressly state whether fraud or market manipulation occurring through or as part of meme coins would be subject to federal enforcement actions under federal securities laws.

The Staff noted that meme coins are “typically purchased for entertainment, social, or cultural purpose, with value driven by market demand and speculation.”  As a result, the Staff views meme coins as similar to collectibles such as trading cards, items lacking use (or limited use) and/or functionality, yet having speculative interest.  The Staff reached the following conclusions as to meme coins described in the Staff Statement:

  1. Transactions in meme coins “do not involve the offer and sale of securities under the federal securities laws”;
  2. Persons who participate “in the offer and sale of meme coins do not need to register their transactions with the Commission under the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act) or fall within one of the Securities Act’s exemptions from registration”; and
  3. Purchasers and holders of meme coins are not protected by federal securities laws.
Continue Reading SEC’s Corporate Finance Staff Issues Statement That Meme Coins Are Not Securities

As Bitcoin reaches prices not seen since November 2021, individuals and entities will undoubtedly consider selling – sometimes called “taking profit” on – Bitcoin and other digital assets to capture previously unrealized gains.  But crypto market participants should be aware of the U.S. tax implications of realizing gains on the sale of digital assets – more importantly, properly reporting such gains to the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”).  As a recent U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) Indictment makes clear, the willful failure to report such gains to the IRS may lead to potential criminal charges.

Continue Reading DOJ’s First “Pure” Criminal Tax Charges in Bitcoin Case Signals Heightened Focus On Tax Reporting of Digital Asset Gains

On August 17, 2023, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas granted summary judgment to the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury) on all of the plaintiffs’ claims in the lawsuit challenging the Department’s Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control’s (OFAC) designation of Tornado Cash, a purportedly decentralized cryptocurrency mixer that runs…