Photo of Tom Dell’Avvocato

Tom Dell’Avvocato is a partner in Crowell & Moring’s London office and a member of the Financial Services Group. Tom is experienced in non-contentious banking and finance transactions with a focus on domestic and cross-border asset-based lending, leveraged finance, and specialty finance. He acts for banks, alternative lenders, and corporate borrowers, and is recognized as a Rising Star in The Legal 500 and as One to Watch in the United Kingdom in the 2024 edition of Best Lawyers. In addition, Tom has been ranked as a Stand-Out Lawyer by Thomson Reuters in 2024.

For many asset-based lenders (“ABLs”) that do not take deposits, CRD VI’s branch requirements will not apply directly — but reliance on the non-bank carve-out requires careful, structure-specific analysis, and does not eliminate all regulatory risk.

General

CRD VI (Directive 2024/1619) introduces an EU-wide framework governing how non-EU undertakings may provide core banking services to EU borrowers. Article 21c requires third-country undertakings providing core banking services (including lending) within a Member State to establish a branch authorised under the Directive (a “third-country branch”). CRD VI applies primarily to “credit institutions” as defined under the Capital Requirements Regulation (“CRR”). The regime sits alongside existing national licensing frameworks. It should also be noted that CRD VI introduces other obligations (including ESG risk management and governance requirements) beyond the scope of this note.

Continue Reading CRD VI: New Rules for Cross-Border Lending into Europe — Why the Non-Bank Carve-Out Matters, but Is Not the Full Story

Asset-based lending (ABL) and adjacent areas of asset-focused finance continually shift towards the center ground of mainstream corporate finance. Flexibility, underpinned by collateral-driven risk, is in demand. The market continues to diverge (in some instances, becoming even more finely-tuned to complex credit, special situations, and restructuring), but its growth is generally well documented, with regulatory capital treatment and multiple other drivers potentially accelerating the same, particularly outside of the traditional banking sector.

So, what should modern stakeholders look out for? ABL structures typically feature fewer traditional financial covenants than cash-flow lending, but involve real operational visibility, asset monitoring, and dynamic controls. Generally, these activate far more swiftly than a conventional financial covenant breach in a heavier term loan structure.

Continue Reading Asset-Based Lending: At Times Covenant-Lite, but Not Control-Lite