What You Need To Know

  • The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued six new general licenses, and updated a seventh that allow for many activities related to: the export of Venezuelan oil and petrochemical products from Venezuela; the exploration, development, and production of oil, gas, and petrochemical products in Venezuela; the generation, transmission, storage, or distribution of electricity in Venezuela; the export to Venezuela of U.S.-origin diluents; negotiating for investment in the oil, gas, petrochemical, and electricity sectors in Venezuela; and the export of Venezuelan gold.
  • The new general licenses contain a number of significant conditions, including in GLs 46B and 51, a limitation to the activities of “established U.S. entities,” and in GLs 46B, 47, 48A, 50A, and 51, limits on counterparties and operators, a prohibition on the involvement of entities with specific relationships to China, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, and Russia, or of sanctioned vessels, and contractual requirements to use U.S. law and U.S. dispute resolution mechanisms.
  • This regulatory space is fast moving, with multiple changes occurring over a short time period, and any plan to rely on these general licenses and authorizations should include transaction-by-transaction assessment, along with monitoring by compliance and legal functions.

Introduction

Over the last two months, OFAC has issued and updated a series of general licenses and Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) that allow for a variety of activities in the Venezuela oil, gas, petrochemical products, electricity, and gold sectors when they involve persons sanctioned pursuant to the Venezuela sanctions regulations, including the Government of Venezuela (GOV) and its state-owned oil company PdVSA.  The specific general licenses are as follows:

  • General License 46 (GL 46): Issued January 29, 2026, updated on February 10, 2026 (GL 46A), and further updated on March 13, 2026 (GL 46B), this license authorizes a broad set of activities related to the export of Venezuelan-origin oil, and the import of petrochemical products into the United States, in each instance as conducted by “established U.S. entities.”
  • General License 47 (GL 47): Issued February 3, 2026, GL 47 authorizes activities related to the sale of U.S.-origin diluents to Venezuela.
  • General License 48 (GL 48): Issued February 10, 2026, and updated on March 13, 2026 (GL 48A), GL 48A authorizes transactions related to the provision — from the United States or by a U.S. person — of goods, technology, software, or services for the exploration, development, or production of oil, gas, or petrochemical products in Venezuela, or for the generation, transmission, storage, or distribution of electricity in Venezuela.  GL 48A also expressly prohibits the formation of new joint ventures or other entities in Venezuela and transactions related to the exportation or reexportation of diluents to Venezuela.
  • General License 30B (GL 30B): Originally issued in 2019, and updated on February 10, 2026, GL 30B authorizes U.S. person transactions with the GOV and another specifically identified sanctioned entity if ordinarily incident and necessary to operations or use of ports and airports in Venezuela. The recent change removed a prior prohibition on transactions involving diluents, likely to avoid a conflict with GL 47.
  • General License 49 (GL 49): Issued February 13, 2026, and updated on March 13, 2026 (GL 49A), GL 49A authorizes U.S. person negotiations of and entry into contingent contracts for new investment in oil, gas, petrochemical products, or electricity sector operations in Venezuela.
  • General License 50 (GL 50): Issued February 13, 2026, GL 50 authorizes transactions related to oil and gas sector operations in Venezuela by five major energy companies and their subsidiaries. On February 18, OFAC added a sixth, reissuing General License 50A (GL 50A).
  • General License 51 (GL 51): Issued March 6, 2026, GL 51 authorizes a broad set of activities related to the export of Venezuelan-origin gold to the United States including for refinement or resale by “established U.S. entities.”

In each general license, OFAC set out significant and detailed conditions that must be observed when relying on these general licenses.  

Key Takeaway #1: GLs 46A-51 are Expansive in the Activities Permitted, But Contain Many Restrictions on How These Activities May Be Performed and by Whom

Although these licenses address a broad range of activities related to the Venezuelan oil trade, their conditions ensure that this will be only a partial re-opening.  These include:

  • a prohibition on the involvement of (i) Iranian, North Korean, or Cuban entities or entities owned or controlled by them (GLs 46B-51), (ii) Russian entities or entities owned or controlled by them (GLs 46B, 48A-51), (iii) Chinese entities or entities owned or controlled by them (GLs 48A-50A) or Venezuelan or U.S. entities owned or controlled by Chinese entities (GLs 46B, 51), and (iv) sanctioned vessels;
  • a requirement for specific contract terms requiring U.S. law, commercially reasonable terms, and dispute processes (GLs 46B, 47, 48A, 50A, 51);
  • mandatory payment mechanics to ensure U.S. government control (GLs 46B, 48A, 50A, 51);
  • reporting standards that must be met (GLs 46B, 47, 48A, 50A, 51); and
  • a requirement to obtain a further OFAC license for the performance of contingent contracts for new investment in oil, gas, petrochemical products, or electricity sector operations in Venezuela (GL 49A).

Businesses that decide to rely on these general licenses will need to take steps to comply with the corresponding conditions.

Key Takeaway #2: Not All Persons Subject to U.S. Sanctions Jurisdiction Can Rely on GLs 46B or 51

GLs 46B and 51 only authorize transactions that are ordinarily incident and necessary to certain specified activities by “an established U.S. entity,” defined as an entity organized under U.S. law on or before January 29, 2025.  This formulation is narrower than the more familiar “U.S. person” standard, and prevents activities by newly formed U.S. entities, and may be intended to prevent non-U.S. companies from using the license by forming such entities.  In FAQs, OFAC clarifies that entities that are not “established U.S. entities” may engage in transactions that are “ordinarily incident and necessary” to an established U.S. entity’s activities that are authorized under GL 46B (OFAC FAQ 1230), and that financial institutions may rely on statements from customers that a transaction is within the bounds of GL 46B, unless a financial institution has reason to know otherwise (OFAC FAQ 1234).

GL 47 is not restricted to “established U.S. entities.”  However, because the focus of GL 47 is on the provision of U.S.-origin diluents to Venezuela, it already, functionally, necessitates U.S. entity involvement.  

GLs 30B and 48A-50A do not contain these limitations and apply broadly to all U.S. persons, including individuals and entities organized under U.S. law regardless of formation date.

Key Takeaway #3: U.S. Law Rules. 

Persons can only rely on GLs 46B-48A, 50A, and 51 if the contracts governing the authorized activity are (i) governed by U.S. law; and (ii) note that any dispute resolution must occur in the United States.

This requirement is likely meant to provide protection to U.S. entities looking to reenter Venezuela by requiring that any disputes and questions of interpretation rely upon U.S., not Venezuelan, law.  It also limits the possibility that a contract could later become subject to a conflict-of-laws issue, whether due to a sanctions blocking statute imposed by a foreign government or regulatory changes from the Venezuelan government.  OFAC confirmed in its FAQs for GL 46B that the dispute resolution requirement is only for agreements between established U.S. entities and sanctioned Venezuelan entities; agreements between established U.S. entities and third parties do not require U.S. dispute resolution mechanisms (OFAC FAQ 1233). We read this FAQ to apply to GL 46B and the other general licenses with these requirements.

Key Takeaway #4: Check For Applicability of Oil, Gas, Petrochemical Products, Electricity, or a Combination

The general licenses are very specific about which products are covered.  The general authorization to export from Venezuela (GL 46B) is explicitly limited to Venezuelan-origin oil (where OFAC FAQ 1226 defines oil as including both crude oil and its blends, as well as petroleum products) and petrochemical products (defined in GL46B itself) and does not extend to gas or broader energy activity.

In comparison, GL 48A authorizes activities related to exploration, development, or production of oil, gas, or petrochemical products, as well as the generation, transmission, storage, or distribution of electricity in Venezuela.  Authorized services include: (i) processing payments; (ii) arranging shipping and logistics, including chartering vessels; (iii) obtaining marine insurance and P&I coverage; (iv) arranging port and terminal services; and (v) maintenance of oil, gas, petrochemical products, or electricity operations, including refurbishment or repair of items used for exploration, development, or production, or for electricity generation, transmission, storage, or distribution.  The same OFAC FAQ 1226 definition (crude oil and petroleum products) would likely apply to GL 48A, expanding this authorization to apply to crude oil and its blends, as well as petroleum products.  Other OFAC FAQs lay out the types of items and services authorized under GL 48A.  Notably, GL 48A expressly prohibits the formation of new joint ventures or other entities in Venezuela and transactions related to the exportation or reexportation of diluents to Venezuela.

The authorization to negotiate investment in Venezuela (GL 49A) applies to oil, gas, petrochemical products, and electricity sector investment, as does the authorization for oil and gas activities involving the six identified entities in GL 50A.

Key Takeaway #5: Foreign Adversaries Keep Out

GL 46B and GLs 48A-51 expressly exclude transactions involving (i) blocked (sanctioned) vessels; (ii) persons located in, or organized under the laws of, Russia, Iran, North Korea, or Cuba, and for GLs 48A-50A, China, as well as entities owned or controlled by such persons; and (iii) entities located in, or organized under the laws of, the U.S. or Venezuela that are owned or controlled by, or in a joint venture with, Chinese (PRC) persons (GLs 46B, 51).

GL 47 contains exclusions over transactions involving persons located in or organized under the laws of Iran, North Korea, or Cuba (and entities owned or controlled by them), and blocked vessels, but does not include the Russia or China exclusions found in the other general licenses.  Parties planning to rely on these general licenses must continue to screen and review ownership of all counterparties, with particular attention to which specific license they are relying upon, because of the exclusions.

Key Takeaway #6: Sustained Oversight and Strict Payment Restrictions by the U.S. Government 

GLs 46B-48A, 50A, and 51 require reports to OFAC noting the parties involved, the quantities and values, the dates of the transaction, and in the case of GLs 46B and 51, the taxes/fees paid to the Government of Venezuela. GL 46B also requires identification of the ultimate countries of destination, while GL 51 requires the documentation demonstrating supply chain due diligence plans.

GL 46B requires reporting to OFAC only when Venezuelan-origin oil is sold to countries other than the United States.  The reports must be submitted within 10 days after the first transaction and each 90 days thereafter.

Significantly, GLs 46B, 48A, 50A, and 51 require that any payments to blocked persons, other than local taxes, permits, or fees, be made to designated Foreign Government Deposit Funds or other OFAC-identified accounts.  These funds will remain under the control of the U.S. government on behalf of the Government of Venezuela.  To obtain payment information for payments to these accounts, the payer should contact the U.S. Department of State (there is a specific email provided) and provide (a) the names and addresses of all relevant parties, (b) a description of the contract or obligation, (c) the date of sale and copies of corresponding invoices/contracts, (d) the amounts, currencies, and dates, (e) the specific license that you are relying upon, (f) copies of transaction records, and (g) a point of contact.

These provisions underscore that GLs 46B-48A, 50A, and 51 create substantial U.S. government visibility into commercial flows, counterparties, and revenue streams tied to Venezuelan oil, gold, petrochemical products, electricity, and gas as well as control over how the Government of Venezuela may use the proceeds of oil, gas, petrochemical products, electricity, and gold sales.  We expect that OFAC will be similarly focused on such control and visibility with respect to any future general licenses, specific licenses, or enforcement of sanctions relating to Venezuela.

Key Takeaway #7: Specific Licenses Still Reign Supreme

If a general license does not appear to authorize any proposed activity, OFAC still offers the possibility of obtaining a specific license.

In one instance (GL 49A), the activity (e.g., negotiating for investment in the oil, gas, petrochemical products, or electricity sector in Venezuela) is only authorized if the final contract includes an express commitment to obtain an OFAC license to perform the agreement. When ready to apply for the contractually required licenses, parties should be aware that OFAC has explained that it will consider authorizing these licenses on a case-by-case basis. OFAC also indicated that the limitations included in the general licenses (e.g., restrictions on dealings with foreign adversaries and sanctioned vessels, requirement to use commercially reasonable terms, U.S. jurisdiction for dispute resolution, and payment into a USG controlled account) can be informative for the likelihood a license may be granted.

Other specific licenses, if approved by OFAC, may be subject to similar restrictions.

Key Takeaway #8: More to Come?  

All of these general licenses are likely to generate increased activity involving U.S.-organized oil traders, shipping companies, logistics providers, and insurers, particularly where Venezuelan oil is destined for the United States.  Since OFAC started issuing these general licenses in early February, it has regularly issued FAQs explaining nuances and answering industry-wide questions. We expect this process to continue as more questions emerge.

Moreover, requirements under other federal authorities, including the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) remain in effect.  Companies should therefore continue to assess whether equipment, technology, or services associated with oil activity implicate export licensing, end-use, or end-user restrictions, particularly where transactions involve sensitive jurisdictions or intermediaries.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Dj Wolff Dj Wolff

David (Dj) Wolff is the co-chair of Crowell & Moring’s International Trade Group and a director with Crowell Global Advisors, the firm’s trade policy affiliate.

At Crowell & Moring, he serves on the steering committee for the International Trade Group, where his practice

David (Dj) Wolff is the co-chair of Crowell & Moring’s International Trade Group and a director with Crowell Global Advisors, the firm’s trade policy affiliate.

At Crowell & Moring, he serves on the steering committee for the International Trade Group, where his practice focuses on all aspects of compliance with U.S. economic sanctions, including day-to-day compliance guidance, developing compliance programs, responding to government inquiries, conducting internal investigations, and representation during civil and criminal enforcement proceedings. Dj works regularly with non-U.S. clients, both in Europe and Asia, to evaluate the jurisdictional reach of U.S. sanction authorities to their global operations, identify and manage the potential conflict of laws that can result from that reach, as well as to support client’s design, implementation, and evaluation of a corresponding risk-based sanctions compliance program. Dj also regularly leads teams in diligence efforts on trade and related regulatory areas on behalf of his U.S. and non-U.S. clients in the M&A arena, having successfully closed more than 30 deals with an aggregate valuation of several billion dollars over the last 18 months.

Dj is ranked by Chambers USA in International Trade: Export Controls & Economic Sanctions. He has previously been recognized by Law360 as a Rising Star in International Trade (2020), by The National Law Journal as a “DC Rising Star” (2019), by Who’s Who Legal: Investigations as a “Future Leader” (2018 and 2019), Acritas Star as an Acritas Stars Independently Rated Lawyers (2019), by Global Investigations Review as one of the “40 under 40” in Investigations internationally (2017), and WorldECR as one of the five finalists for the WorldECR Young Practitioner of the Year award (2016).

Photo of Erik Woodhouse Erik Woodhouse

Erik Woodhouse is a partner in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office and a member of the firm’s International Trade and Financial Services groups, where he provides in-depth experience and practical solutions on sensitive economic sanctions and anti-money laundering matters, informed by his

Erik Woodhouse is a partner in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office and a member of the firm’s International Trade and Financial Services groups, where he provides in-depth experience and practical solutions on sensitive economic sanctions and anti-money laundering matters, informed by his experience in private practice and in government at the Department of the Treasury and the Department of State.

Erik works with U.S. and foreign clients operating across borders on all aspects of these regimes, including developing and assessing compliance programs, advising on complex statutory and regulatory requirements, and leading companies through internal and government investigations. He has worked with major manufacturing and tech companies with global operations, multinational banks, investment funds and other financial services firms, and digital assets and virtual currency companies, collaborating with Crowell’s cross-disciplinary team that comprises former senior regulators, federal prosecutors, and in-house counsel.

Prior to joining Crowell, Erik served as Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Counter Threat Finance and Sanctions at the Department of State, where he played a key role in the Department’s policy development and implementation related to all U.S. country-based sanctions programs and a range of global programs. Erik worked with counterparts across the executive branch to establish and implement new sanctions programs, coordinated U.S. sanctions policy with foreign governments, and engaged with private sector stakeholders on a range of U.S. sanctions priorities. Erik’s prior government experience also includes service at the Department of the Treasury’s Office of International Affairs.

Earlier in his career, Erik worked as a project finance attorney and litigator, as a law clerk for the Honorable M. Margaret McKeown of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and as a research fellow at Stanford University’s Program on Energy & Sustainable Development.

Photo of Caroline Brown Caroline Brown

Caroline E. Brown is a partner in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office and a member of the firm’s White Collar & Regulatory Enforcement and International Trade groups and the steering committee of the firm’s National Security Practice. She provides strategic advice to…

Caroline E. Brown is a partner in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office and a member of the firm’s White Collar & Regulatory Enforcement and International Trade groups and the steering committee of the firm’s National Security Practice. She provides strategic advice to clients on national security matters, including anti-money laundering (AML) and economic sanctions compliance and enforcement challenges, investigations, and cross border transactions, including review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) and the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. Telecommunications Services Sector (Team Telecom).

Caroline brings over a decade of experience as a national security attorney at the U.S. Departments of Justice and the Treasury. At the U.S. Department of Justice’s National Security Division, she worked on counterespionage, cybersecurity, and counterterrorism matters and investigations, and gained unique insight into issues surrounding data privacy and cybersecurity. In that role, she also sat on both CFIUS and Team Telecom and made recommendations to DOJ senior leadership regarding whether to mitigate, block, or allow transactions under review by those interagency committees. She also negotiated, drafted, and reviewed mitigation agreements, monitored companies’ compliance with those agreements, and coordinated and supervised investigations of breaches of those agreements.

Photo of Carlton Greene Carlton Greene

Carlton Greene is a partner in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office and a member of the firm’s International Trade and White Collar & Regulatory Enforcement groups. He provides strategic advice to clients on U.S. economic sanctions, Bank Secrecy Act and anti-money laundering…

Carlton Greene is a partner in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office and a member of the firm’s International Trade and White Collar & Regulatory Enforcement groups. He provides strategic advice to clients on U.S. economic sanctions, Bank Secrecy Act and anti-money laundering (AML) laws and regulations, export controls, and anti-corruption/anti-bribery laws and regulations. Carlton is the former chief counsel at FinCEN (the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network), the U.S. AML regulator responsible for administering the Bank Secrecy Act.

Photo of Jeremy Iloulian Jeremy Iloulian

Recognized as a “Rising Star” in International Trade by Super Lawyers, Jeremy Iloulian advises clients globally on complex cross-border regulatory, compliance, investigative, and transactional matters and policy developments that touch U.S. national security, international trade, and foreign investment, including those relating to

Recognized as a “Rising Star” in International Trade by Super Lawyers, Jeremy Iloulian advises clients globally on complex cross-border regulatory, compliance, investigative, and transactional matters and policy developments that touch U.S. national security, international trade, and foreign investment, including those relating to U.S. export controls (EAR and ITAR), economic sanctions, anti-boycott laws, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), and various national security controls on fundamental research and supply chains.

Jeremy has extensive experience counseling U.S. and non-U.S. clients, including public and private companies, private equity sponsors, and nonprofits spanning a multitude of industries, including aerospace and defense, energy, entertainment, fashion, food and beverage, health care, infrastructure, technology, telecommunications, and transportation. He provides strategic guidance on managing risks for dealings in high-risk jurisdictions such as China, Russia, Venezuela, and the Middle East, among other countries and regions. He regularly advocates on behalf of such clients before the U.S. Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC), Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), Bureau of Economic Affairs (BEA), Census Bureau, Department of Energy, and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).

Additionally, Jeremy has previously counseled on, presented on, and published research related to international environmental law, specifically the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES).

Prior to and during law school, Jeremy interned at multiple government agencies, including the United Nations, the U.S. State Department, and the Iraqi Embassy in Washington, D.C.

Photo of Rachel Richman Rachel Richman

With a focus on White Collar and Regulatory Enforcement and International Trade, Rachel Richman assists clients—from startups to large corporations—in navigating government investigations and regulatory challenges.

Photo of Jasmine Masri Jasmine Masri

Jasmine Masri is an associate in Crowell & Moring’s Government Contracts and International Trade groups. Jasmine focuses her practice on global compliance issues, regulatory enforcement matters, and government investigations. Through her practice, Jasmine provides counsel on a variety of matters at the intersection…

Jasmine Masri is an associate in Crowell & Moring’s Government Contracts and International Trade groups. Jasmine focuses her practice on global compliance issues, regulatory enforcement matters, and government investigations. Through her practice, Jasmine provides counsel on a variety of matters at the intersection of government contracts and international trade, including cross-border government procurement, economic sanctions, and export controls.

Photo of Dmitry Bergoltsev Dmitry Bergoltsev

Dmitry Bergoltsev is a Senior International Trade Specialist I in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C., office. With professional fluency in Russian and Mandarin, Dmitry bridges language and cultural barriers, offering valuable insights for clients navigating complex global trade and regulatory matters. He works…

Dmitry Bergoltsev is a Senior International Trade Specialist I in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C., office. With professional fluency in Russian and Mandarin, Dmitry bridges language and cultural barriers, offering valuable insights for clients navigating complex global trade and regulatory matters. He works closely with attorneys to develop practical solutions for clients facing challenges before the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), and other federal agencies. Dmitry’s key areas of focus include advising clients on sanctions and export controls compliance, U.S. import and export regulations, and supply chain due diligence, with particular attention to the geopolitical and regulatory risks our clients face when operating across global markets.